Volkswagen wants to put the brakes on a claim against it in a Mayo district court
The German car giant has asked for the case to be moved to Dublin.
CAR MANUFACTURING GIANT Volkswagen has launched a High Court challenge aimed at halting an action against it before Castlebar District Court.
Eithne Higgins, a nurse from Croghan in Boyle Co. Roscommon has sued Volkswagen, seeking compensation over the German car maker’s admission last year it had cheated on emissions tests.
The admissions resulting in the recall of hundreds of thousands of cars.
Ms Higgins, the owner of a Seat Leon which has a Volkswagen engine, claims Volkswagon’s admissions concerning emissions could have implications for her in respect of Vehicle Registration Tax, road tax and any attempt to trade in her car.
The case has come before Judge Mary Devins at Castlebar District Court, and is due back before the judge on Friday.
The car maker’s application came before Mr Justice Anthony Barr during Thursday’s vacation sitting of the High Court, who granted leave to bring the proceedings.
Lacks jurisdiction
Lawyers for Volkswagen Group Ireland Ltd and Volkswagen AG, who oppose the claim, say Castlebar Court lacks the jurisdiction to hear Ms Higgins’s claim. They argue the action should be heard by the District Court in Dublin.
Arising out of what it says are the procedural flaws and a lack of fair procedures, Volkswagen Ireland has brought a High Court judicial review action against Ms Higgins aimed at preventing the case proceeding before the Co. Mayo court.
Moving the application, Paul Gardiner, senior counsel for Volkswagen, said it is his client’s case that the hearing before Judge Devins was “totally flawed” and should not be allowed continue any further.
The case could not be heard just because Ms Higgins had bought the car second hand from a dealership in Co. Mayo, counsel said.
Dublin case
Counsel said that the case should be heard in Dublin along with other similar cases from other parts of the country.
This is because the defendants in Ms Higgins and the other claims are based in Dublin and Wolfsburg in Germany, counsel added.
Counsel said that despite the fact Volkswagen claim Castlebar District Court lacks the jurisdiction to hear the action, Judge Devins has already determined that issue. She had done so without hearing any evidence or a formal motion, counsel continued.
Seeking the stay on the proceedings, counsel said Ms Higgins would not suffer any prejudice by the bringing of this action as her potential losses had not been determined and she did not plan to exchange her car until next year.
Mr Justice Barr said an arguable case had been made out by Volkswagen. Permission to bring the action was granted on an ex-parte basis, where only one side was represented in court.
The Judge said he was also satisfied to place a stay on Ms Higgins’s case from proceeding before Castlebar District Court until the High Court judicial review case has been determined.
The Judge made the matter returnable before the High Court to a date in early October when the new legal term begins.
