Glasnevin Trust has sued Twitter to reveal who's behind 'grossly defamatory' posts

The organisation operates the historic Dublin cemetery, among other sites.

By Aodhan O'Faolain

THE TRUST THAT operates and maintains Dublin’s Glasnevin Cemetery has secured High Court orders directing Twitter to disclose the identity of an anonymous user who made a number of allegedly defamatory statements.

The orders were granted by Mr Justice Paul Gilligan in favour of Dublin Cemeteries Committee trading as Glasnevin Trust.

However the judge declined to make an order directing Twitter to delete material posted on the social media platform concerning the trust.

The trust sought orders against Twitter International Company, including one directing it to carry out a number of steps such as disclosing the identity of the user of a profile called ‘Justice4Employees’ at the address @Glasnevinexpose.

It also sought orders directing Twitter to disclose emails accounts, IP addresses and postal addresses associated with the account, and that posts relating to the trust be removed.

The type of orders sought by the trust are known as Norwich Pharmacal orders.

Seeking the orders, Eugene Gleeson SC for the Trust said between January and the end of March posts that were disparaging, defamatory and damaging to the trust and members of its staff appeared on the Twitter account.

While the posts ceased at the end of March, the “highly offensive” statements still remain on the social media platform, counsel said.

His client was seeking various relief in a bid to have the damaging and defamatory statements removed from where they can be seen by the public.

Impossible situation

Twitter, represented by Paul Coughlan Bl, neither consented nor objected to the orders but had suggested that they be amended.

Counsel said his client had concerns over an application directing Twitter to delete all material posted on the account. It was not in a position to say if the remarks complained of on the account were defamatory or not, he added.

To be asked to remove such statements in the absence of any finding that the remarks are defamatory left Twitter in an “impossible situation”, he said.

Twitter said the order should be sought against the person or persons who posted the comments.

Counsel added the trust had delayed in seeking the orders given that it had first raised the issues in March.

In his ruling, Mr Justice Gilligan noted that the remarks made about the largest cemetery in Ireland, which contains many monuments of historical significance, were “very serious” and appeared “grossly defamatory”.

The judge said he was prepared to grant orders in favour of the trust concerning the identity of the account users without any of the amendments advanced by Twitter.

He said, however, that he was not prepared to make orders directing Twitter to take down the material.

The judge said such an order should be sought after the identity of the user is known and they have been notified of the proceedings. He gave Twitter 21 days to comply.

Sign up to our newsletter to receive a regular digest of Fora’s top articles delivered to your inbox.

Comments