Clerys' buyers accused of 'unfairly mischaracterising' a probe into the store's closure

The High Court heard a ‘directors pack’ with financial details of staff was central to a disputed investigation.

By Aodhan O’Faolain & Saurya Cherfi

A ‘DIRECTORS PACK’ containing financial details about the iconic Clerys department store and its workforce was one of the reasons why inspectors sought documents at the offices of a Dublin-based property company, the High Court has heard.

The inspectors, who are conducting an ongoing investigation into the collective redundancy of the store’s 460 workers in June 2015, claim the pack was issued by D2 Private before the group of companies that owned and operated Clerys was sold to a joint venture called Natrium by its previous owners, the US Gordon Brothers group.

Natrium is made up of Cheyne Capital Management in the UK, and a company of Deirdre Foley – the owner of property firm D2 Private.

The pack contained detailed information including financial statements and accounts of the company that operated Clerys, OCS Operations, as well as the employee’s names, their dates of birth, their years of service, holiday entitlements and their total earnings.

The inspectors, appointed by the Workplace Relations Commission, are opposing a challenge brought by D2 and Foley against the WRC concerning the powers of the inspectors, who seized documents and a computer from D2′s offices in May.

A complex matter

Shane Murphy SC, for the WRC, said inspectors attended at D2 Private offices as part of their investigation into what has become a complex matter.

The inspectors sought materials from D2 after being made aware of the pack, which they claim was supplied to directors of OCS Operations, Brendan Cooney and Jim Brydie, by an employee of D2 Private before the takeover by Natrium.

The directors were appointed by Natrium hours after the Clerys takeover. That same day – 12 June, 2015 – they went to the High Court and sought to have OCS Operations, which was loss-making, wound up.

13/6/2015. Clerys Shop Sold
Source: Sam Boal/RollingNews.ie

The pack, which contained details about the workers, also contained a watermark linking it to D2 Private.

Counsel also told the court said the investigators rejected claims they have acted outside their remit. They have at all times conducted their investigation in a proper and lawful manner, counsel said.

The applicants were attempting to “unfairly mischaracterise” the investigation, counsel added.

Not the employer

In their challenge, D2 Private and Foley say neither they nor Natrium were ever the employer of the Clerys workers. They also say the inspectors were not allowed to take the materials, which they add include privileged and confidential material, and have acted outside the remit of their investigation.

They inspectors, they add, are not entitled to rely on provisions of the 1977 Protection of Employment Act and the 2015 Workplace Relations Act to justify the taking of documents from the D2 office.

They seek various orders and declarations including an order that the materials be returned. They are also seeking damages for alleged misfeasance in public office and breach of privacy. The application is being supported by Natrium which is a notice party to the proceedings.

Also at the High Court on Tuesday, Foley was criticised and heckled by one of the 460 former Clery’s worker who lost their jobs when the store shut its doors.

12/6/2016. Clerys One Year Anniversary Protests
Source: Leah Farrell/RollingNews.ie

Shortly before Justice Michael Twomey rose at 4pm, 64-year-old John Crowe from Artane told the court he had worked at the department store for 43 years before it closed.

Despite his years of service at the store, he said he had to make an appointment so he could get personal items out of his locker four weeks after the closure.

An emotional Crowe said he had been left with noting adding all he had in is pocket was €6 and he could not afford the bus fare to come to court. He also said he hoped the courts give out better treatment than “the way I have been treated.”

Outside of the courtroom, Crowe was vocally critical of Foley. Surrounded by her legal team, she left the precinct of the courthouse without comment.

The hearing continues.